A Bit About Me

Modern crises never unfold along a single axis. Political shocks bleed into military escalations; energy pressure drives economic instability; cyber disruption shapes battlefield outcomes; and public narrative alters how leaders calculate risk. Most analysis isolates one domain. My work does not.

​

I analyse crises as multi-domain systems, where decisions in one area echo across all the others. Whether the scenario is a real crisis or built through fictional states, the aim is the same: to understand how leaders make decisions under pressure, with incomplete information, imperfect options, and time running out.

​

This site exists as both a research space and a thinking tool. It blends real-world crisis assessments with structured strategic simulations, allowing ideas to be explored, stress-tested and refined safely and creatively.

​

How I Think

I approach crises by mapping the interaction between military operations, politics, alliances, logistics, energy, cyber effects and public perception. Strategy doesn’t sit in one lane, so my analysis doesn’t either.

​

My simulations use realistic constraints, adversary logic and turn-based decision cycles to mirror how real crises unfold: step by step, choice by choice, under uncertainty.

​

Why I Do This

My aim is simple: to think clearly about the hardest situations.

Crises reveal the limits of power, time, resources and perception. and understanding those limits is the foundation of real strategy.

​